CASE OF THE WHENEVER #24, PART THREE (general remarks)
The recognition of a lesion, person, or other object by visual means involves
the integration of the present image with a mental storehouse of visually
derived information. The verbal or written expression of the reasons
(criteria) for the recognition is elusive and, at best, incomplete. For
instance; if I were to describe my brother to you in extensive and accurate
detail, you probably would not be able to pick him out of a crowd of adult,
Caucasian males of similar age. If, however, you had met him on several
occasions, you would have no difficulty recognizing him.
In spite of the shortcomings of expressed criteria for diagnoses, they
do provide an adjunct for teaching pathology. The danger lies in relying
on such criteria, particularly a single criterion, in making a diagnosis.
Pundits who are quite capable of correctly diagnosing a difficult case
often state that they have done so by utilizing a few pet criteria. That
this has involved a more complex, though subconscious, process has not
been appreciated. This becomes harmful when a resident with insufficient
visual experience attempts to diagnose a complex case based upon one or
two such criteria. This can be a serious problem with melanocytic lesions
in that there is probably not a single criterion, taken in isolation, that
allows one to distinguish between an benign and a malignant lesion.
A diagnosis or a narrow differential diagnosis occurs almost immediately
to an experienced dermatopathologist when first confronted with a slide.
Subsequent manipulation and examination of the slide is for confirmatory
purposes when the diagnosis is apparent, or sequential fields that
satisfy a subconscious algorithm are examined when there is a differential
diagnosis to ponder. At this point he/she either knows the diagnosis or,
hopefully, is aware that he/she does not. It is also at this point that
he/she dictates observations or statements that support the diagnosis.
The images in Part One could have been picked
by someone who sought supporting criteria after making a benign diagnosis,
possibly spindle cell nevus (Spitz), . Let us examine some of the
'benign' criteria that one could invoke in this case. This examination
is not to denigrate these criteria but to put them into perspective.
-
SYMMETRYFigures 1 & 2
Scanning power lesional profile: Symmetry is often in the eye
of the beholder, and this determination frequently is made after deciding
the nature of the lesion based on other factors. I can recall a national
meeting where the speaker projected a markedly asymmetrical banal nevus
and verbally described it as being symmetrical. Snickers from the audience
were ignored. There are symmetrical melanomas and there are asymmetrical
nevi though these are in the minority. Neoplastic progression can start
anywhere, including equidistant from the edges, in a precursor lesion.
Intralesional profiles as seen under higher powers:
Symmetry from top to bottom is lacking in many compound nevi, intradermal
nevi, and spindle cell nevi. In such cases it is referred to, euphemistically,
as maturation.
There can be dissimilar populations of nevus cells side by side resulting
in asymmetry. We seldom notice this because the dissimilar cells are 'normal'
as determined by previous experience. The 'abnormal' cells in combined
nevi stand out and are troublesome to those not familiar with them. The
'abnormal' cells or cell cluster in a combined
nevus that contact an adjacent population of 'abnormal' cells
should
not have expansile properties (in the easier cases). When several dissimilar
melanoma cell populations are found in the dermis, they characteristically
are in contact with other melanoma cells, either cytologically malignant
or minimal deviation variants.
-
INTRAEPIDERMAL NESTS IN THE PERIPHERYFigures
3 & 4
So-called fuzzy edges can be seen in dysplastic nevi, nevi having architectural
disorder, and in subtle melanoma precursors, particularly lentiginous ones.
Melanomas arising in such backgrounds have led to the false corrollary
that clusters of normal nevus cells should not be in the periphery of a
melanoma. Nests of normal nevus cells can be found in the periphery of
a melanoma arising in an ordinary nevus if neoplastic transformation has
not occured in the periphery.
-
KAMINO BODIESFigure 5
Kamino bodies were once purported to be found exlcusively in spindle
cell nevi (Spitz). They can be found in melanomas though they are usually
absent or few in number. Dyskeratotic keratinocytes also can be found uncommonly
in melanomas and in halo nevi.
-
SPACED FASCICLES OF SPINDLE CELLSFigure
6
Fascicles composed of cytologically benign spindle cells that are separated
by stroma are characteristic of spindle cell nevi (Spitz). Similarly spaced
fascicles of spindle cells can be found in desmoplastic melanomas, and
the degree of atypia is minimal in some examples.
-
MATURATIONFigure 7 andFigure
12
Maturation is best illustrated in those Spitz nevi that have large
spindle cells or clusters of large, myoid, epithelioid cells in the superficial
part of the lesion with diminution in cell size in the deeper aspects of
the lesion. This can be emulated in melanomas where normal nevus cells
have been pushed down or displaced by invasive melanoma cells. This is
also emulated in some dysplastic nevi and in some melanomas where there
is sequential invasion by phenotypically different cell populations. I
would interpret the large, atypical epithelioid cells in the most superficial
nest in Figure 7 as being fully developed melanoma cells, the next layers
as melanoma cells of minimal deviation type, and the very deepest cells
as nevus cells.
Click on your browser's 'Back' button to return to PART TWO.
or
Click on PART ONE to return to that page.
or
Click on HOME to go there.