MELANOCYTIC NEOPLASM OF INDETERMINATE MALIGNANT POTENTIAL, ETC.
The lesion presented is prototypic of one that I see from time to time,
and I have periodically placed it in a variety of different categories.
I have not done follow-up studies. The subject lesion is characterized
by:
-
Atypical lentiginous and junctional melanocytic hyperplasia (dysplasia)
-
Expansion of the papillary dermis by fibrous tissue to a thickness of greater
than 1 millimeter
-
The presence of widely scattered, small clusters of slightly atypical nevus
cells or melanocytes in the fibrotic papillary dermis
-
Lack of a history of superficial trauma
I was curious as to the way people who know more about melanocytic lesions
that I would classify this lesion. The solicited opinions usually included
disclaimers as to limitations imposed by not having the glass slide available.
The comments are mine and should be taken with a grain of salt. The opinions
(bold type) include:
-
Compound dysplasia; borderline melanocytic neoplasia of indeterminate
malignant potential or, based on size, intermediate melanocytic neoplasia
of indeterminate malignant potential; incomplete arrested variant growth
pattern present.
Comment: This diagnosis embodies terminology that is included in a
Web presentation by R.J.
Reed. At first glance, this terminology appears cumbersome, but it
actually is an accurate reflection of what is present. It conveys an appropriate
degree of concern regarding the biology of the lesion without committing
the lesion to a benign or malignant category.
-
Atypical compound nevus with moderate to severe melanocytic dysplasia
and arrested incomplete development of variant vertical growth
Comment: This would be a good alternative to the diagnosis given
above, particularly if it a statement regarding prognostic uncertainty
were appended.
-
Atypical or severely dysplastic nevus
Comment: Dysplastic nevi exist, but these have been variously defined
to include architectural disorder with or without cytologic atypia. The
associated risk factor, particularly for the lesions lacking cytological
atypia, was initially overstated for the nonfamilial lesions. This
has led to the abandonment of the term by some dermatopathologists. A more
complete designation reflecting the extreme fibrosis and scattered nature
of the small nests of slightly atypical cells (arrested variant vertical
growth) would be desirable if this lesion is to be studied as an entity.
'Atypical nevus' has been suggested as a replacement for dysplastic nevus,
but that term has been defined exclusively by clinical criteria in some
centers. If the term 'atypical nevus' reflects cytologic atypia, it should
be clarified in the pathology report.
-
Lentiginous compound dysplastic nevus with moderate to severe atypia;
recommend conservative re-excision.
Comment: A treatment recommendation such as this is appropriate when
one is concerned about the biology of any residual lesion.
-
Nevoid melanoma
Comment: In the simplest of terms (without getting into a discussion
of objective criteria) a diagnosis of nevoid
melanoma is often made after an initial impression of nevus is followed
by the realization that the lesion is a melanoma. Since many melanomas
share some architectural, cytological, or immunohistochemical features
with nevi, some fully malignant melanomas, some minimal deviation melanomas,
and a variety of worrisome melanocytic lesions get dumped into this category.
This would not be my preferred term for this lesion.
-
Unusual fibrotic Clark's nevus
Comment: Figure 8-20 on page 191 in Human Malignant Melanoma by
Clark et al; Grune and Stratton publishers, 1979 depicts a lesion such
as the subject case as 'The melanocytic dysplasia of B-K mole.' Be
that as it may, I have seen the term, Clark's nevus, used, probably inappropriately,
for a variety of melanocytic lesions including architectural disorder without
atypia.
-
Rutten's nevus
Comment: Dr. Heinz Kutzner mentioned that a member of their group,
Dr. A. Rutten, has been interested in this type of lesion, and their group
has been collecting these since 1989. There have been no metastases or
recurrences. Hopefully, they will share their experiences in detail.
-
Persistent nevus with atypical features
Comment: Some recurrent or persistent nevi have atypical lentiginous
, junctional, or even pagetoid melanocytic hyperplasia associated with
fibrosis, the fibrosis representing traumatic scar. A few clusters of slightly
atypical nevus cells or melanocytes will be found in the superficial fibrous
tissue in a few cases. Therefore, a superficial biopsy may have features
very similar to those presented in this case. Though the pattern of fibrosis
in a traumatic scar is usually different than that seen in dysplastic nevus
variants, there can be cases where the distinction cannot be made solely
on the basis of a small biopsy. A negative history for superficial trauma
may be a distinguishing feature as in this case. It was mentioned that
the scar from the previous punch biopsy of the subject lesion was not illustrated
in the photomicrographs. The hyperplasia in a recurrent nevus is characteristically
confined to the area over the scar.
-
Ancient fibroblastic or burnt-out Sutton's nevus
Comment: Sutton's nevus (halo nevus or leukoderma acquisitum centrifugum)
is, among other things, initially characterized by a lymphocyte attack
on nevus cells. Subsequently, this reaction may be followed by disappearance
of the lymphocytes and partial or complete replacement of the nevus by
fibrous tissue. The type of atypical intraepidermal melanocytic hyperplasia
(dysplasia) that is seen in the subject lesion is not a feature of the
prototypic halo nevus. The degree of expansion of the papillary dermis
by fibrous tissue that is seen in the subject case is not a feature of
the histologic halo reaction. In other words, the end result of the histologic
halo reaction shares qualitative features with dysplastic nevi having an
arrested vertical growth (prominently fibrotic) pattern; however, there
are differences in the nature of the initiating lesion.
-
Burnt-out dysplastic nevus
Comment: This would take into the account the dysplasia and the fibrosis.
This would imply that ongoing proliferation of atypical melanocytes with
an accompanying fibrous host reaction is not currently taking place.
In view of the clinical history of expansion, it is not possible to exclude
the possibility that this is an ongoing, smouldering process.
-
Melanoma, minimal deviation or otherwise
Comment: I have, in the past, put this type of lesion in the minimal
deviation melanoma category in spite of the fact that typical vertical
growth (a dominant, expansile nodule of minimally atypical
cells) is not present. I did this in an attempt to convey the idea that
the biology of the lesion may not be predictable. There obviously is a
better way to convey this without using the word 'melanoma'. A recommendation
for a conservative re-excision of the area can be made in good conscience
without using the word 'melanoma' in the diagnosis.
CONCLUSION
This lesion does not have the features of an ordinary malignant melanoma
or the features of an ordinary nevus. Although it is ultimately true that
a melanocytic lesion is either benign or malignant at the time of the biopsy,
forcing the diagnosis into a 'nevus' or 'melanoma' category without qualification
denies the existence of melanocytic neoplasms of indeterminate biologic
potential. Terminology and concepts are available to define subsets of
these lesions. Follow-up studies on these subsets may clarify the biologic
potential.
I would like to thank those persons who volunteered opinions on this
case. Some gave the opinions directly; others were quoted (I hope accurately)
by members of their organization. These include (in alphabetical order):
S. Cowper, H. Kutzner, P. LeBoit, L. Duncan, T. McCalmot, R. Reed, A. Rutter,
R. Tuthill, W. Tyler and anonymous department members of some of the groups.
The patient is a 58 year old male, and this came from the hip/buttock
area. This lesion measured 1.5 centimeters in greatest dimension three
years ago. A 6 mm. punch biopsy was done at that time and read as benign.
The lesion has grown to 2.7 mm. in greatest dimension since that time,
and the current specimen is the basis of this presentation. The scar from
the previous biopsy is not illustrated below.
 |
| Scan power view of part of the lesion. The
markedly expanded, fibrotic papillary dermis is demarcated from the reticular
dermis by the wavy black line . There are widely scattered nests of
slightly atypical, small, dark melanocytes trapped within the fibrotic
papillary dermis. Atypical lentiginous melanocytic hyperplasia with the
occasional formation of junctional clusters is seen across the width of
the epidermis. Solar elastosis is not seen.This area had not been subjected
to superficial therapy. |
 |
Composite low power view of widely scattered clusters
of slightly atypical melanocytes in the expanded, fibrotic papillary dermis.
The wavy, black line marks the boundary between the papillary dermis and
the reticular dermis. No abnormal cells were found in the reticular dermis.
The deepest cell clusters were 1.18mm. below the stratum granulosum. There
is no maturation. |
 |
Very high power view of small, dark cells
that form clusters in the fibrotic papillary dermis. Some of the small
blood vessels have thick walls. |
 |
Composite medium power view of small, dark cells
in a wide, lentiginous distribution and also forming clusters in the lower
epidermis. |
 |
High power view showing a focus of infiltration of
the papillary dermis by slightly atypical, small, dark cells apparently
originating in the epidermis. The invasion of the papillary dermis by an
abnormal population of intraepidermal melanocytes is a cause for concern
but is not unequivocal evidence of malignancy. |
Click on your browser's 'Back' button to return to the previous page.